Retail has had a tough time of it. With major shifts in consumer behavior, the need for omnichannel investments and increasing pressure on margins, there’s never been a more pressing need to manage costs.
Wondering how to do it?
Our new white paper, Reverse eAuctions: How Retailers Can Optimize Spend and Improve Profitability, looks at how this sourcing strategy empowered by technology can be a great tool, driving competitive behavior to achieve the most favorable outcome for your enterprise. The paper discusses how reverse auctions work at a psychological level, how new technologies have enhanced their capabilities, and how they help bring more spend under control.
What’s Inside:
This paper is a must-read for sourcing and retail professionals looking for impactful cost-reduction measures.
Slim operating margins, relentless competition from e-commerce, changing consumer habits — the retail industry has been facing these challenges, all of which have been exacerbated by the pandemic. As a result, many physical retail outlets have been impacted and are closing.
The industry urgently needs to improve its cost and profit margins, and one proven way to do this is through reverse eAuctions. The CPG and pharma sectors, too, face challenges similar to retail and have leveraged reverse eAuctions effectively to drive cost reduction. Reverse eAuction programs, in which suppliers compete against each other online by submitting competitive bids, have the potential to drive incremental savings in the retail space as well, though retailers have been slow in adopting the tool, largely due to misconceptions owing to the lack of understanding about eAuctions and their effectiveness.
The retail industry has seen two sharp shifts in consumer behavior: online buying and cost-consciousness.
While the e-commerce sector has gained traction over the past decade, the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically sped up the adoption of online shopping, with people preferring safe, contactless transactions. Given the current social distancing rules at physical retail stores, and ultimately the convenience of online shopping, more and more consumers will likely transition to and continue with online shopping for both essential and non-essential items. The pandemic has also impacted finances, and consumers are now more inclined toward e-commerce, which gives them a wide variety of costeffective options.
Online shopping is here to stay, and retail must adapt.
Managing spend has been a challenge for most retailers and their procurement teams. As in most sectors, in retail Goods For Resale (GFR) accounts for approximately 80% of the purchasing budget with 20% of the total supplier base, while Goods Not For Resale (GNFR) contributes to ~20% of the overall spend and has 80% of one’s total suppliers. GFR and GNFR are synonymous with direct and indirect catgories. Managing GNFR has not been a focus for retailers owing to the complex and diverse nature of the spend categories and the large number of stakeholders (influencers) involved other than procurement. GFR, on the other hand, seems relatively simpler to manage due to the highly standardized nature of its categories. However, often GFR and GNFR are managed at a local level, for individual business units and stakeholders have well-established relationships and engagements with local preferred suppliers, making it tough to consolidate demand and adopt a centralized (regional/global) procurement strategy.
Poor spend management, rising costs (property, labor, commodity), the need to invest in digital technologies for better customer experiences, strong competition from online retailers and change in consumer behavior have all put great pressure on retailers’ margins.
Retail procurement organizations need to explore alternative ways to reduce costs and drive value, and one way to do that is by leveraging reverse eAuctions. These auctions, however, are not a substitute for traditional negotiation; they are an innovation that can be used additionally.
Although not a new strategy, eAuctions have been modernized in recent years by virtue of technological advancements, making the tool more intuitive and enabling various strategies (like reverse, Japanese and Dutch auctions, for example) for the most desirable outcome. Retailers can drive savings by implementing the right kind of sourcing strategies across both GFR and GNFR, to improve profit margins and drive efficiencies. Reverse eAuctions have been shown to consistently deliver the best price for the desired level of quality and service with greater efficiency and effectiveness.
eAuctions is an often underutilized strategy. Our experience shows it can be a powerful method to increase margin in partnership with merchants and suppliers
— Patrick Hoffmann, Senior Director, GEP
Our research has shown that eAuctions improve efficiencies for merchandising organizations and deliver incremental gross margin improvements. So, how does it work?
The true value of online reverse auctions is in driving competitive behavior to realize the most desirable outcome. An eSourcing event is essentially like a game, and we can apply the rules of the game theory to eSourcing events. The prisoner’s dilemma (illustrated in the figure), one of the most well-known concepts in game theory, demonstrates how reverse auctions work. It describes a situation where two players acting strategically will lead to a suboptimal choice for both. Here, two prisoners suspected of committing a crime together are interrogated separately: they can choose to remain silent or confess. The outcome is dependent upon the unknown action of the other prisoner. Since neither prisoner knows the action of the other, self-interest leads each player to confess and they both end up in prison. This is the most probable outcome, though both players would have achieved their MDO with a different strategy
A similar payoff matrix results in such sourcing events.
Category profile and market environment are the key determinants for gaining an in-depth understanding of supplier tactics and potential outcomes in reverse auctions. Learning from past events and understanding the objective will help change the dynamics of the event and develop the strategy for better outcomes each time.
Moving rapidly toward a digital future, procurement should leverage big data, artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, advanced automation and blockchain to further enhance eAuctions capabilities:
Procurement may once have been considered a cost center, but technology and innovation in sourcing will allow it to function like a profit center, through improved visibility, lower costs, enhanced compliance and better risk management.
Retailers should look at a comprehensive solution to reduce their GFR and GNFR costs and improve margins. A three-pronged approach will help achieve these goals:
Retailers must look to adopt a centralized (regional/global) procurement strategy to manage their GFR and GNFR spend. A decentralized approach increases rogue spending and reduces the opportunity for cost reduction. To manage these categories effectively, it’s important to develop the right sourcing strategy, which requires category expertise, strong sourcing acumen, and skills in negotiation, stakeholder management, change management and supplier management. Procurement can play a vital role in bringing these skill sets to the table.
Retailers should adopt eSourcing tools for RFx and eAuctions to reduce their cost on GFR and GNFR categories and improve margins.
Retailers often take a traditional approach to managing their spend, hesitating to outsource these categories. However, partnering with sourcing and procurement companies can bring significant advantages, giving retailers access to expert perspectives and advice so as to achieve value beyond just sourcing.
A combination of these procurement strategies, software and expertise will help retailers implement sustainable costreduction measures, improve cash flow and and get on the path to recovery and growth.
Theme: Procurement