March 12, 2025 | Procurement Strategy
Sustainability regulations are getting stricter. For procurement and supply chain professionals, the pressure to track, report and reduce emissions has never been higher.
The numbers speak for themselves.
91% of organizations track Scope 1 emissions, 88% track Scope 2, but only 70% cover Scope 3 — the most complex and far-reaching category, reveals a survey by Supply Chain Brain commissioned by GEP.
Even more concerning, more than a quarter of businesses still don't measure Scope 3 emissions at all.
Yet Scope 3, which includes indirect emissions from suppliers and logistics partners, is exactly where regulators are tightening the screws.
The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) proposed climate disclosure rules will demand detailed emissions data—right down to supplier contributions.
Procurement leaders who wait to act risk being caught unprepared when compliance deadlines hit.
Most organizations aren’t ready for full-scale Scope 3 tracking.
The biggest hurdle? Bad data.
Nearly half (49.5%) of procurement professionals say poor data quality is their top challenge in sustainability reporting. Without precise, standardized data from suppliers, emissions estimates are little more than guesswork.
Right now, many businesses rely on spend-based calculations, where emissions are estimated based on financial transactions. But regulators are pushing for activity-based calculations, which require actual emissions data from suppliers.
The problem? Suppliers—especially in lower tiers—often lack the technology or expertise to provide this information.
Procurement teams must mandate emissions tracking as part of supplier contracts.
AI-powered platforms can automate data collection, flag inconsistencies and provide real-time emissions insights.
A combination of spend-based and activity-based data can provide a clearer picture while suppliers improve reporting capabilities.
It’s one thing to measure Scope 3 emissions - it’s another to actually reduce them. Yet GEP’s survey shows 27.3% of companies aren’t taking any action to cut their Scope 3 footprint.
Why? Because supplier engagement is tough. Many suppliers lack the resources or incentives to prioritize sustainability, and procurement teams often struggle to enforce standards without jeopardizing relationships.
Instead of punishing non-compliant suppliers, companies should work with them—providing training, funding pilot programs or co-investing in sustainable technologies.
Procurement teams should give preference to suppliers that demonstrate measurable progress in emissions reduction.
The survey found that 31.3% of businesses are focusing on high-impact categories first—a practical strategy to drive meaningful reductions quickly.
Despite the regulatory pressure, only 30.3% of businesses already have tools in place with established baselines, targets and performance tracking.
AI-driven procurement platforms can automate emissions tracking, centralize supplier data and generate compliance-ready reports in real time. This is crucial because the regulatory bar will only rise.
To identify at-risk suppliers before they fall behind on compliance.
Ensuring supplier-reported data is accurate and tamper-proof.
To eliminate manual errors and streamline compliance with multiple regulatory bodies.
Organizations that take this approach won’t just meet compliance requirements—they’ll gain a competitive edge in an increasingly sustainability-conscious market.
Reporting frameworks like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) are becoming standard. Meanwhile, governments worldwide are moving toward mandatory, real-time emissions disclosures. Businesses relying on manual, ad hoc reporting will struggle to keep up.
Outsourcing to a sustainability consultancy may be the best option.
Investing in an automated reporting system can reduce costs and improve accuracy.
Many organizations are outsourcing some elements while building in-house capabilities for long-term sustainability leadership.
Procurement leaders can no longer afford to take a wait-and-see approach to sustainability regulations. The numbers from the GEP survey make it clear—many companies are still unprepared, and compliance deadlines are approaching fast.
Hybrid approaches (spend- and activity-based) will provide the best insights.
Sustainability must be a shared goal, not a procurement checkbox.
The right tools can make compliance seamless while unlocking competitive advantages.
Businesses that build scalable, audit-ready reporting systems now will avoid last-minute compliance scrambles.
Taking action today isn’t just about compliance with regulations. It’s also how you get a foot in the door to shape the future of sustainable procurement.
Is your organization ready? Download the GEP bulletin Getting Ready for Big Shifts in Sustainability Regulations and find out how you stack up.