American companies spend almost $15 billion on third-party market research every year – and yet, the industry as a whole is facing a period of soft growth. The reasons? The aftermath of the recent recession and shrinking marketing budgets. As a result, marketers are increasingly forced to do more with less and squeeze the maximum value from market research agencies.
The good news – the explosion in the number of research agencies, including a number of smaller upcoming firms, offering a variety of services and capabilities, as well as innovative and exciting new research technologies. As shown in the graph below, although Nielsen is the clear market leader, other agencies are fairly concentrated with respect to market share and capabilities, causing high industry fragmentation and offering strong leverage to buyers of research services.
The bad news – most marketers are still struggling to effectively manage their market research costs. Research is often conducted on an ad-hoc basis and market researchers are wary of letting in procurement professionals into this arena as they fear that procurement teams may not fully comprehend the nuances of market research. More often than not, this really is the case. As a result, procurement teams are not able to realize potential savings fully.
What, then, can procurement teams do to get it right and keep research costs down for their companies and clients? We, at GEP, have identified procurement and other cost optimization strategies to reduce Non-syndicated Market Research spend, without sacrificing quality, to enable procurement professionals extract the most value from their market research dollars. Here are some of them:
Market research is the systematic gathering, recording and analysis of data that helps marketers understand and evaluate the impact of their business strategy and/or marketing and advertising campaigns. This could take the form of a favorable impact on sales, an increase in brand awareness, consumer conversion, etc. The graphic below highlights some of the questions research can answer for marketers.
Understanding the differences between various types of research is key, especially when contracting and negotiating rates for various tests and studies. Market research falls broadly into two categories.
These include market data (for example, point of sales, viewership) or general industry research reports that are regularly tracked or conducted by a company and made available to multiple firms via a subscription service. Examples include industry reports by Forrester and Gartner, surveys and polls conducted by Gallup, Nielsen's TV Ratings, etc.
Also known as custom research, non-syndicated research includes specific research conducted for particular clients that addresses their needs, and to which only they have access. Non-syndicated Services are further divided into two categories: Qualitative Research and Quantitative Research.
Qualitative research is mostly observational in nature and is conducted in the exploration phase. It is characterized by small groups of respondents, usually around 6- 12, and cannot be generalized to the whole population. It is used by marketers for very early stage evaluation of ideas and concepts. Examples of qualitative research include findings gleaned from Focus Groups, In Depth Interviews and Ethnographies.
This is generally used to test and measure marketing hypotheses and develop statistically verifiable insights. It involves surveying large groups of respondents that can vary from 100 to over 1000, and can be generalized to the whole population. Quantitative research is an important step prior to taking any key marketing decisions, such as product development or branding. Some examples of quantitative research are Copy Testing, Concept Testing, In-Home Use Testing, etc.
The chart below provides some sample outputs of conducted research studies
Marketers generally use a number of specialized agencies to carry out market research, analyze results and develop insights. As research can be a complex process, involving a variety of technologies, methodologies and expert judgment from highly experienced market researchers, using a professional market research agency is essential for ensuring strong results and avoiding the risk of inaccurate findings. It is, therefore, necessary to understand how research is conducted to be able to analyze and identify areas to optimize costs.
Most research studies can be broken down into the following steps:
Each of these steps can add variable complexity and costs to research which will be discussed in detail.
Non-syndicated Market Research is a process that involves various steps and phases. In order to realize savings, it is important to identify cost drivers, so as to address the costs. The following figure demonstrates the average cost breakdown of each phase of research.
Each phase of research is different, with a different set of costs involved.
This is the first phase of research and is the stage where the project is initiated and designed. In most cases, there is a pre-objective phase, which is the briefing stage.
In most cases, marketers already have longstanding relationships with their research agencies, which are fully aware of the marketer's brands, products and target audience, as well as their research needs and objectives. Hence, the initial briefing and proposal phase is generally free of costs due to pre-designed metrics and pre-defined goals.
Costs arise in the main objective phase, particularly if a new agency is brought on board, or if a new type of research is to be conducted by an existing agency. These costs are generally associated with agency immersion; they comprise hourly consulting fees for internal meetings and workshops conducted with key firm stakeholders, such as brand managers and researchers, to get a better understanding of the brands, as well as the objectives of the study.
These costs can be addressed by internally evaluating the time spent on this phase, and the consulting fees charged by agencies for it. Be specific in your requests to ensure clarity of purpose and avoid misinterpretation.
This phase includes the following factors:
This is a crucial aspect of a research study. Studies generally have two questionnaires, the screener – which is used to screen participants for the study -- and the actual research questionnaire. Constructing a questionnaire requires skill and experience. The right number and the right type of questions need to be framed in order to provide strong statistical insights. Besides, the questions have to be worded carefully to ensure that they are unbiased, unambiguous, exhaustive and mutually exclusive. The amount of time spent on responding to a questionnaire can range from 10 minutes to over half an hour. The comprehensiveness of a questionnaire is the main driver of costs. Research tests that are regularly conducted by marketers, such as advertising or concept tests, have pre-designed questionnaires that are slightly modified for each new test. Questionnaire development does not contribute considerably to overall research study costs, unless a new set of questions is specifically needed.
Sample size is the number of participants needed in the research study to achieve statistically significant and reliable results and insights. A sample size is obtained after a certain number of candidates has cleared the screener. Sample sizes for research studies can range from 100 to over 1000 participants, and is a major driver of costs within a research study as it is expensive to include a large sample of people to participate in a study. Furthermore, unlike questionnaire development and proposal design, a new sample has to be identified each time a study has to be conducted to avoid respondent bias.
Also called over-quotas, augments act like independent smaller samples added to a study in order to get an understanding of a sub-segment of a population. The augments are weighted and merged to the total sample to avoid over or under representation of the sub-segments. As with sample size, adding augments to a study increases the cost due to additional recruiting of participants.
Incidence rate is the percentage of a category of people within a population satisfying certain criteria. For example, the incidence rate of people who drink cola in the United States is 75%. This translates to three in every four people within the United States drinking cola. In marketing research, incidence rate reflects the ease of obtaining eligible candidates for the research study. The lower the incidence rate, the harder it is to find eligible candidates to partake in the study, leading to an increase in the cost of the research study.
Research has become more technology-oriented and agencies nowadays use patented techniques or technologies, such as virtual stores, eyetracking or brain activity monitoring devices, to understand consumer engagement. Administering technology devices, maintaining them and translating their output into measurable insights can significantly increase the cost of a research study.
These costs can be addressed by evaluating if the following can be accomplished without compromising the quality of the study:
This phase includes the following factors:
The method of panel recruitment and surveying adds to the cost of a research study. Recruiting participants and administering surveys online is much cheaper than conducting telephonic or face-to-face interviews, although in some cases (for example, Hispanic research) this cannot be avoided. In qualitative research, such as focus groups, the length of the discussion session affects the cost of the research study.
Incentives provided to respondents to participate in a study can also affect the cost of research, especially in studies such as Central Location Tests and focus groups, where participants may have to travel to a facility for the research study. Although participants need to be fairly incentivized to participate in studies, a balance needs to be struck to ensure that the incentive does not add to costs disproportionately.
Depending on the research study, other costs that arise during field work include shipping of products, facility usage and moderator costs, especially for Central Location Tests and focus groups. These costs will be dependent on the sample size, as well as the number of products tested.
These costs can be addressed by assessing the feasibility of the following:
This phase includes the following factors:
While coding and processing of survey responses is a fairly standard process, additional costs arise when coding open-ended questions, which do not have a fixed set of responses and, instead, require the participant to enter detailed responses. Although open ends can be a great source for qualitative data within a quantitative survey, the coding process to ensure reliable results can be extremely tedious. A questionnaire having one open-ended question administered to 100 people will result in 100 qualitative responses, which will need to be normalized in order to be measured quantitatively.
Regular data tabulation, statistical analysis and insights will generally be included within the research cost. However, asking for additional analysis (for example, Volumetric Forecasting, Source of Volume or Total Unduplicated Reach & Frequency for concept tests) can add significant costs to the study.
These costs can be addressed by internally evaluating the number of open-ended questions and analysis conducted on the research study.
This phase includes the following factors:
The type of report requested at the end of the study can affect the cost of a research study. An Excel data table will not incur additional costs, while top-line reports and in-depth reports detailing the methodology and findings in PowerPoint can be significantly more costly.
In case the research agency team is asked to present its findings onsite, the associated travel costs will add considerably to the total research cost.
These costs can be addressed by replacing in-depth reports by top-line reports and reducing agency travel costs by utilizing video conferencing options.
The cost of conducting a research study can vary immensely, depending on the methodology, technology, approach and the depth of analysis and reporting. A Fortune 500 company can easily conduct up to at least 500 custom studies to research products, new concepts, advertising impact, customer satisfaction, etc. And although research can be costly, in the long run, it is often more expensive to make erroneous decisions based on incorrect or inadequate information. Thus, it becomes all the more important to effectively manage and optimize marketing research dollars. Marketers can extract greater value for their money by taking the following steps:
The classic procurement and sourcing best practices are highly applicable to market research. Evaluating and benchmarking needs versus agencies currently used, and consolidating certain types of tests with a set of preferred agencies provides great leverage in terms of pricing, as agencies are better able to understand the marketer's business needs and forecast future research requirements.
Labor is one of the biggest drivers of marketing research costs as human capital is required to conduct surveys as well as data analysis and reporting. The quality of the researchers on the agency team can drastically affect the costs of a study, as well as the depth of the insights provided. An industry veteran with over ten years of experience can provide stronger insights, compared to an analyst, but will definitely be more expensive. It is essential to ensure that the agency research team has a good balance of senior leaders as well as analysts to get maximum value for your research dollars.
Standardizing research tests and creating pricing grids can provide greater visibility into the cost of conducting a research study, and help with pricing negotiations. If items such as questionnaire length and the technology utilized are standardized, a pricing grid for each type of research study can be created, as illustrated in the following figure. The grid shown on the left is purely for illustrative purposes where one cell is equivalent to a survey conducted on a single concept. One will notice that the cost decreases as the incidence rate increases and when the number of cells increase. While an increase in the incidence rate highlights the ease of recruitment, the cost per cell decreases as multiple cells are used in a study, indicating the efficiencies achieved due to economies of scale.
In many cases, marketers may plan to conduct an extensive one-off research study that may not follow the contracted pricing. For example, studies conducted before a global launch of a new product or to understand new branding or retail strategies can incur significant costs -- upwards of a million dollars. While demand management techniques can be applied in such cases, it is essential to understand the aspects of the agency proposal, as well as client needs, to ensure that the quality of the study does not get eroded.
The following table shows how demand management can be applied to reduce costs
Figure 4 – Employing Demand Management without impacting statistical “Degrees of Freedom”
Market research is essential for marketers, as strong insights are critical for making strategic business decisions. While this fact cannot be ignored, the current economic conditions, as well as the push for businesses to cut overhead expenses in order to remain profitable, will impact market research spend. It is important to realize that both of the two seemingly divergent strategies need to be in sync for the company's future success. Even with the uncertain economic conditions prevalent today, market research does not need to be sacrificed to maintain costs. Instead, procurement should find ways to optimize market research costs in order to maximize both sides of the profit equation.
Theme: Procurement