March 04, 2025 | Procurement Strategy
The electrical equipment industry is staring down the barrel of another tariff crisis. With proposed new tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada—some as high as 25% on key electrical components—the power and utilities sector could see project costs skyrocket, lead times stretch even further, and supplier reliability plummet.
What can procurement leaders do to mitigate risks?
The electrical equipment sector is particularly vulnerable to trade disruptions.
Under existing Section 301 tariffs, electrical components from China already face duties ranging from 7.5% to 25%. Now, additional tariffs could further impact key materials such as:
Mostly sourced from China and Mexico, facing lead times of 1-4 years.
Limited U.S. production means price hikes if foreign supply contracts.
Subject to Section 232 tariffs on steel imports, driving up infrastructure costs.
These increases won’t just affect procurement teams — they will hit project economics, causing budget overruns and regulatory headaches.
In regulated utilities, tariff-driven cost hikes might not be recoverable through rate increases, forcing companies to absorb the financial burden or cut back on critical projects.
Procurement leaders need a granular understanding of where their suppliers are located, what components are most vulnerable to tariffs and how price increases will affect their budgets.
Regular supplier assessments and scenario modeling will be essential in making informed procurement decisions. Additionally, leveraging modern procurement platforms to gain 360-degree visibility into suppliers is essential in managing supplier risk.
For critical components with long lead times, procurement teams should consider stockpiling materials ahead of tariff implementations. While excess inventory carries storage costs, the alternative—project delays due to unavailable equipment—can be far more expensive.
Adjusting procurement contracts to include flexible pricing clauses and timeline buffers will help mitigate unexpected tariff-driven cost spikes. Including contingency clauses for raw material price fluctuations can protect both buyers and suppliers from sudden economic shocks.
Procurement teams should explore alternative sources in non-tariff regions such as South Korea, Vietnam, and Japan. While these markets may have higher base costs, they offer greater stability in a shifting trade landscape.
While Mexico and Canada face tariff risks, they still present advantages over China due to geographical proximity and existing trade agreements. Companies should weigh whether nearshoring offers a net benefit despite tariff concerns.
Expanding U.S.-based production of key electrical components is a long-term solution, but it requires strategic partnerships and significant investment. However, domestic production would reduce dependency on volatile foreign trade policies and improve supply chain resilience.
Also Read: The Key Supply Chain Strategies to Navigate the Impact of Trump Tariff
Procurement leaders must collaborate with industry associations to push for tariff exemptions on essential energy infrastructure materials. Trade groups such as the National Foreign Trade Council’s Tariff Reform Coalition, the National Association of Manufacturers and the Associated Equipment Distributors are already advocating for more favorable trade policies to prevent supply disruptions.
Finance teams should run multiple tariff scenarios to gauge their impact on operational budgets. Utilities, in particular, must engage regulators early to discuss cost recovery mechanisms before tariffs take effect.
Tariffs and trade policy shifts aren’t just a theoretical risk — they are a looming reality for procurement teams in the electrical equipment sector.
Leaders must take decisive action now, leveraging data-driven insights, supplier risk assessments and proactive policy engagement to shield their supply chains.
AI-powered procurement platforms can help companies navigate this complexity, ensuring resilience in the face of geopolitical uncertainty.
The time to act is now. The cost of inaction? Rising expenses, supply shortages, and project disruptions that no procurement leader can afford to ignore.
Take the Next Step