August 12, 2024 | Procurement Strategy
Businesses constantly seek new ways to streamline procurement processes, reduce costs and increase enterprise-wide efficiency. With procurement going through significant transformation across industries, the strategic importance of optimizing the procurement practice. However, enterprises often have to make a choice between centralized procurement and decentralized procurement. Which is the better choice? Is there an alternative? Let’s explore.
Centralized procurement follows an approach where procurement activities are consolidated and run through a single, centralized department or team. In this procurement strategy, a central procurement team is responsible for managing and executing all procurement activities across the enterprise.
Decentralized procurement on the other hand is a procurement strategy where individual departments, business units, or regional offices within an enterprise make their own procurement decisions. This approach is in contrast with centralized procurement, where a single, dedicated department handles all procurement activities for the entire organization.
A centralized procurement strategy offers several advantages to business, including:
Centralized procurement enables standardization of procurement processes, eliminating redundancies and reducing administrative overheads. This leads to higher efficiency.
An enterprise can leverage its collective buying power by consolidating its procurement requirements. This also helps the procurement team to negotiate better prices and discounts for higher cost savings.
Centralized procurement by its very nature relies on a central repository that consolidates procurement data, enabling enterprises with complete visibility spending patterns.
A centralized procurement structure is more effective at managing supplier relationships, their performance, as well as negotiating contracts. It also results in strategic and stronger partnerships with suppliers.
Centralized procurement results in better quality control over all the aspects. This too leads to standardized processes, bringing consistency in product and service selection.
Centralized procurement is not without its challenges and disadvantages, including:
Procurement activities that get routed through a centralized team may face bottlenecks and delays when demands are high or when there’s a resource constraint.
Businesses that are spread across the world often have a complex procurement structure. A centralized procurement strategy makes it difficult to navigate the logistical and cultural challenges that arise from diverse regional needs.
A centralized procurement organization at times might not be able to adapt well in time to changing market conditions due to lack of agility and responsiveness.
A centralized procurement team may not have specific knowledge of the requirements of individual departments and product categories. This is often because of a lack of regular exchange of information with individual departments.
Decentralized procurement offers several advantages to businesses, including:
Individual departments know their needs better than what others would perceive. This ready knowledge enables them to respond quickly without getting tangled in cumbersome processes.
Decentralized procurement enables enterprises to leverage the local market knowledge of their teams for faster turnaround times and alternative options.
Decentralized procurement enables every department and region to procure what they need and when they need it, based on their specifications.
Reduced bureaucracy means reduced number of approvals, which in turn means faster decisions and even quicker implementations.
Centralized procurement teams have a lot on their plate, but individual procurement teams in departments have the flexibility to build innovative solutions that fulfill their specific requirements in a better way.
Decentralized procurement too comes with potential drawbacks that enterprises need to consider:
Enterprises may have fewer opportunities to save costs and miss out on volume discounts and negotiation capabilities.
Different departments will likely use different processes, which will eventually lead to enterprise-wide inconsistencies. And as years go by, a pileup is more than likely.
Multiple departments might be performing similar tasks in sourcing and vendor management, wasting time, effort and resource.
Due to its scattered nature and varying processes, it's harder for enterprises to track overall spending.
Different departments may have set varying standards and parameters for services and products, leading to inconsistent quality.
Whether an enterprise chooses either of the two — centralized procurement or decentralized procurement strategy — the balance between the advantages and disadvantages will vary depending on its size, structure, industry, and needs.
But there are some that try to walk the middle path, essentially implementing a hybrid model.
A hybrid model has elements of both centralized and decentralized procurement to maximize benefits and minimize drawbacks for any enterprise, in which the central procurement team sets policies and handles high-value categories, while providing guidance to decentralized procurement teams in each department. This maximizes resource utilization both in terms of dollars and human resources, and at the same time maximizes output.
Still confused, GEP can help. Contact us today.